The basic jist seems to be that they are not happy, for whatever reason, with the way institutionalised church works so they thought it a good idea to go and start their own. Churches of course have their problems, they are made up of people like me for a start which is always going to give you grief, but can you just go off and form your own variety of church? Would it actually be church? Is there still / was there ever any value in institutionalised religion?
I must confess these are somewhat loaded questions to which I already have at least some form of opinion on but I wondered what you thought.
Over to you.






10:16 am
Whilst I can agree with the sentiment behind what is being said in the post about ‘If we could do church’ I do think there are many advantages of having structure and organisation to a church body. When there are people who are payed to work for the church then they are freed up for tasks that they could not do if they had another full time job as well. I also believe that specific people have specific annointings and giftings - so while it may sound like a nice idea for everyone to be doing the preaching, that may not be the most effective way forward for the church.
I very much do not like the idea of people going off and starting their own church just because they are unhappy with the workings of the church they currently attend. Sometimes churches get caught up in difficulties but if the answer to dealing with those were to up and leave and form a church where those issues don’t come up, I guarentee that further down the line something similar will crop up. We can either run away from stuff or we can work it out - I believe in working stuff out because it is better in the long run.