And rest…

Category : Bible, Religion, Society

Wondering around the web I recently stumbled upon a blog post about how the early Christians viewed the Sabbath. After I left a brief comment I thought it worth noting here.

As the debate continues about Sunday trading and the continuing calls to relax the Sunday trading laws even further should we, as Christians be bothered? Well I’m not entirely sure we should.

I do of course understand why parts of the Church is bothered. Societyââ?¬â?¢s move away from traditional Christian views on such things is a sign of societyââ?¬â?¢s ever increasing move away from the church however this is one battle that I’m not sure it’s worth fighting.

For the early Christians it is uncertain as to when they celebrated the Sabbath. Some were obviously converts from Judaism so may well have still used Saturday. While the Greeks may have used Sunday or some other day. Today the tradition of using Sunday comes from the fact that our Lord Jesus rose from the dead on a Sunday. The precise day we should use is not recorded, nor do I believe is that the point.

In Mark 2, after Jesus is challenged about picking grain on the Sabbath he replies with a great line.

“The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath”

The Sabbath was put in place by God because it’s good to have a day where we rest from our day to day work and our main focus is God. For our physical and spiritual well being it is important for us to have a day of rest in the Lord. God designed us after all, He should know.

In today�s world it does not seem feasible that everything should shut down for a day. (Maybe this is a sad thing.) And quite apart from the supermarkets being open there are obviously others that must work on a Sunday. Doctors, Police, Vicars etc.

The point of the Sabbath was not a legalism for us to follow. Simple it was God telling us that we need a day in the week to recharge our spiritual and physical batteries. And besides, sometimes I need to pop out for a loaf of bread on a Sunday *smile*

Who is the Lady at Walsingham?

Category : Religion

A little while ago I wrote about the idea of pilgrimage and its relevance to our Christianity today in my article entitled “The Sacred Places“. During my recent half term holiday I visited one such site of pilgrimage, although I wouldnââ?¬â?¢t myself describe my purpose for being there as such. This was the famous Anglican Shrine to Mary at Walsingham in North Norfolk.

What I am about to say is a touch controversial but please let me state that not only is it not my intention to offend but also that these are not my finished views. In this post I am merely thinking out loud and asking some questions.

Like many such shrines around the world this was set up due to a vision of Mary which was received in Walsingham. All the details of what happened where and when can be found on the Walsingham Shrines Web-site. My question really stems from the way I responded to my visit to the shrine. I have never been to such a place before and I understand very little of the Anglo-Catholic tradition so please do not be surprised when I say that I was shocked at the amount of focus Mary received.

As you enter there are many pictures and statues depicting her in different Biblical events, and plaques dotted around with prayers written too her. When I entered the shrine a service was going on. The congregation were walking around the building chanting a liturgy with the lead declaring a name for Mary; for example ââ?¬Å?Mary, mother of our Lordââ?¬Â, ââ?¬Å?Mary, Queen of Heavenââ?¬Â, and after each one the congregation chanted ââ?¬Å?please pray for usââ?¬Â.

I understand that the belief is that Mary did not die but was taken into glory and so I assume this is how they get around the idea that God tells us not to talk to the dead (Deut 18: 9-11, 1 Sam 28: 1-25, 1 Chron 10: 13-14, Isa 8: 19) but surely from Hebrews (Heb 9: 15) we should understand that Jesus is our great mediator and he is the one who is interceding for us. Maybe I�ve missed something?

My horror was complete, and horror is not too strong a word for how I felt, when I entered the inner chapel where the chanting procession had finished up. Above the alter was what I can only describe as a pale doll which had a silver crown on it�s head and was wearing a white flowing robe hung watching over proceedings. This was clearly an image of Mary but looked like something from a horror movie.

I have a number of questions relating to this; horror movie esk image aside. I have no problem with God providing a vision to people for whatever reason. Also we know that Elijah and Moses appeared with Jesus at the transfiguration so I guess that something similar could happen with Mary but visions of Mary always seem to lead to shrines about her. (It might be worth noting that at the transfiguration Jesus rebuked Peter for wanting to build a shrine to the event basically suggesting that he had missed the point.) (Mark 9: 2-13) They do not seem to point towards Christ. This fact should surely be ringing alarm bells as we know that a test of any such event should point people towards Christ. (By event I mean visions, prophecy, expansions of scripture, Christian literature, Christian arts etc.) All this seems to be doing is focusing people on Mary, not Christ. I think I was also a little uncomfortable about the focus of the alter being on this doll of Mary as the Bible clearly says that we shouldn�t worship / bow down to carven images. Is this basically idolatry?

Overall I felt very disturbed by my visit and really wanted to get out of, what to me felt like a very oppressive atmosphere. As I said at the beginning it is not my intention to offend and I do not know enough about all that is involved to come up with a definitive trail of thought for what I believe about this but it does at moment smell, at least to me, of a deception. These things should surely point us towards our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the fact that this doesn�t seems to be at very least, worrying.

Have I missed something?