Make Pornography History

4

Category : Society

Something I have been pondering for while is the steady but definite lowering of the boundaries in who can access and even what qualifies as sexually explicit material.

While this is something that has been a growing issue for a while several recent things have brought it once again into my thoughts. Apart from anything else the continued rise of SPAM emails received offering the material is always there. Also, as soon as you leave the beaten track as you surf the web the banner ads to such sites are there. Such material on the internet is expected these days are there are many ways help prevent yourself coming into contact with it. However, the even more obvious sign that the issue is growing has been from the media (film, TV, Magazines) and, possibly even more concerning, the attitude that has been demonstrated by a number of my pupils in a recent Homework excercise (more of that later).

The moving of the boundaries in the media is there for all to see; only last night I saw an advert on TV for a men�s razor. It consisted of a guy showering with two girls all shaving various parts of their anatomy together. When I first saw the ad I did think that is was porn and quickly changed channel but when it appeared on another channel as I was flicking around I realised it was an advert. All I can say is that it didn�t leave anything to the imagination. This is a continuing trend with companies as our advertising seems to become more and more European.

Itââ?¬â?¢s not just advertising thatââ?¬â?¢s the problem. Main stream cinema has been becoming more and more explicit for some time with early this year another major milestone was past in the release of the film ââ?¬Ë?9 Songsââ?¬â?¢ which, for the first time contained actors having actual sex.
Now, it could be argued that while the limits of what can and canââ?¬â?¢t be shown are falling to some obscene levels at least these films have an 18 certificate and such explicit advertising is reserved for after the 21:30 watershed. However, the other disturbing rise has been in the nature of so called ââ?¬Ë?menââ?¬â?¢s magazinesââ?¬â?¢ (FHM, Loaded, Maxim, and more recently weekly publications such as Zoo). I can remember a time when FHM actually did have interesting articles with only a sprinkling of scantly clad ladies. I was shocked to see some of the more recent editions of these magazines not only contained mostly naked women but also came with additional booklets of women and even a DVD with two lesbians on the front called the Kama-Sutra.

Some people at this point are calling me a prude I�m sure. And please don�t mistake what I saying, I am well aware that this kind of material has been available from the top shelf of most good stockists for some time. What really concerns me is the freedom at which this is now accepted and available, especially to young people.

There has always been a taboo about buying from the top shelf. While I know of many people, including lots of my friends who have owned so called girlie magazines I know of very very few who have been able to bring themselves to actually buying the material themselves. However, with this new breed of publication, anybody of any age can freely and happily buy them with out any question or second thought. This type of material is accepted, even expected. You only have to turn on MTV and watch the latest rap and R�n�B tracks to see how accepted such material is.

Some work was submitted to me recently by some year 8 pupils; 12-13 year olds. The task was to write about what sort of things make a good web-site for teenagers. I was shocked when I received a very similar answer from a good number of the lads and even a few girls in the class. They said that the web site should contain rude pictures and rude games because that is what teenagers find interesting! The answer itself didn�t shock me. What shocked me was their willingness to convey it to me. They felt that this was an acceptable response and in fact their way of making it acceptable was to use the term rude rather than another term more in keeping with the times.

So what exactly am I rambling on about? I wonder if it is time for somebody to stand up and simply say that this is wrong. Not only wrong for the individual consumer but that it is actually bad for the health of society as a whole. I don�t really want to get into a debate about the men and women in the industry that generates this stuff. About whether they are right or wrong, good or evil, trapped into it or freely choose to be a part. I simply feel that, Christianity and God�s view of this aside (although when you actually think about it it is very difficult to separate the two), there is a real case for this problem as I see it having a serious effect on marriage and families, as well as warping younger minds about the nature of women and relationships as a whole. Add this to the growing evidence for a link between the available of pornography on then internet and the rise in increasingly more violent sexual crime and paedophilia and I think there is a case to start working towards closing this industry down.

I�m sure at this point, if you are still reading, that I have been written off by some of you as a crazy guy living in a dream world who just wants take away peoples freedom of expression and apply censorship all over the place. I would agree that I have not thought this through however I am under no illusions about the fact that we are talking about a very long road. I wouldn�t even know where to start. All I am saying is that pornography, and society�s slide towards acceptance of it is simple wrong and is very damaging.

When Wilberforce spoke out against the slave trade it was at a time when slavery was socially accepted and on the increase across the whole of British Empire. Forty years later slavery was made illegal and while many still wanted it to be allowed the government acted on behalf of the people for the greater good. I am coming around to the idea that it maybe time for somebody, or a group of people to speak up against this and see if governments are still willing to act, against a growing tide, for the sake of the greater good.

We have seen something similar recently with the Make Poverty History campaign. While we have not seen that come to completion yet, the world�s powerful people have stood up and taken notice.

Maybe it�s time for something similar here?

The smaller side to God’s Kingdom

Category : Bible

I was at a prayer meeting this week and the person leading this came out with a comment which blew me away just a little bit. The comment was nothing new, but was expressed in such a way as to make me marvel a little bit more at how amazing God works things out. The comment was simply that, “God took away the sins of the cosmos, by placing some cells into the womb of a virgin”.

Isn’t it just incredible how God uses the smallest possible way to do the hugest possible things? We see also in Genesis 2 where God made the first human being by taking a bit of dirt and breathing on it! You would think that the all powerful God would have started off His cherished human race in a more spectacular fashion wouldn’t you.

The truth is I love it – I love the way that God does things in ways that seem absolute madness to the so called intelligent ones among us. I love the way God says (in 1 Corinthians 1):

“Brothers, think of what you were when you were called. Not many of you were wise by human standards; not many were influential; not many were of noble birth. But God chose the foolish things of the world to shame the wise; God chose the weak things of the world to shame the strong. He chose the lowly things of this world and the despised thingsââ?¬â?and the things that are notââ?¬â?to nullify the things that are, so that no one may boast before him.”

These verses are of great comfort to me – because they speak of a power that is part of the very core of who God is – and that power can be worked out in our lives through the simplest, most minute thing. In an age where every person, every business, every politician, every television programme is fighting to be the best, to be the biggest, I take heart in knowing that it is God who makes something great, it is God who makes things happen – and He could do any of those things with a bit of dirt that He picked up off the floor.

Who is the Lady at Walsingham?

Category : Religion

A little while ago I wrote about the idea of pilgrimage and its relevance to our Christianity today in my article entitled “The Sacred Places“. During my recent half term holiday I visited one such site of pilgrimage, although I wouldnââ?¬â?¢t myself describe my purpose for being there as such. This was the famous Anglican Shrine to Mary at Walsingham in North Norfolk.

What I am about to say is a touch controversial but please let me state that not only is it not my intention to offend but also that these are not my finished views. In this post I am merely thinking out loud and asking some questions.

Like many such shrines around the world this was set up due to a vision of Mary which was received in Walsingham. All the details of what happened where and when can be found on the Walsingham Shrines Web-site. My question really stems from the way I responded to my visit to the shrine. I have never been to such a place before and I understand very little of the Anglo-Catholic tradition so please do not be surprised when I say that I was shocked at the amount of focus Mary received.

As you enter there are many pictures and statues depicting her in different Biblical events, and plaques dotted around with prayers written too her. When I entered the shrine a service was going on. The congregation were walking around the building chanting a liturgy with the lead declaring a name for Mary; for example ââ?¬Å?Mary, mother of our Lordââ?¬Â, ââ?¬Å?Mary, Queen of Heavenââ?¬Â, and after each one the congregation chanted ââ?¬Å?please pray for usââ?¬Â.

I understand that the belief is that Mary did not die but was taken into glory and so I assume this is how they get around the idea that God tells us not to talk to the dead (Deut 18: 9-11, 1 Sam 28: 1-25, 1 Chron 10: 13-14, Isa 8: 19) but surely from Hebrews (Heb 9: 15) we should understand that Jesus is our great mediator and he is the one who is interceding for us. Maybe I�ve missed something?

My horror was complete, and horror is not too strong a word for how I felt, when I entered the inner chapel where the chanting procession had finished up. Above the alter was what I can only describe as a pale doll which had a silver crown on it�s head and was wearing a white flowing robe hung watching over proceedings. This was clearly an image of Mary but looked like something from a horror movie.

I have a number of questions relating to this; horror movie esk image aside. I have no problem with God providing a vision to people for whatever reason. Also we know that Elijah and Moses appeared with Jesus at the transfiguration so I guess that something similar could happen with Mary but visions of Mary always seem to lead to shrines about her. (It might be worth noting that at the transfiguration Jesus rebuked Peter for wanting to build a shrine to the event basically suggesting that he had missed the point.) (Mark 9: 2-13) They do not seem to point towards Christ. This fact should surely be ringing alarm bells as we know that a test of any such event should point people towards Christ. (By event I mean visions, prophecy, expansions of scripture, Christian literature, Christian arts etc.) All this seems to be doing is focusing people on Mary, not Christ. I think I was also a little uncomfortable about the focus of the alter being on this doll of Mary as the Bible clearly says that we shouldn�t worship / bow down to carven images. Is this basically idolatry?

Overall I felt very disturbed by my visit and really wanted to get out of, what to me felt like a very oppressive atmosphere. As I said at the beginning it is not my intention to offend and I do not know enough about all that is involved to come up with a definitive trail of thought for what I believe about this but it does at moment smell, at least to me, of a deception. These things should surely point us towards our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, the fact that this doesn�t seems to be at very least, worrying.

Have I missed something?